![]() |
The nuclear power plant found in the TV comedy, "The Simpsons" |
What powers our appliances at home? Why, electrical energy, of course. Everyone needs electrical energy but there are downsides to it - take, for instance, the sky-rocketing electric bills we get each month! This is mostly due to the high cost of power generation which is done in power plants that use fossil fuels such as coal and crude oil. Now, think about it -- what if there could be a cheaper, yet equally effective alternative? Enter nuclear energy, or the "energy of tomorrow".
But, what is nuclear energy, really? According to Wikipedia, nuclear energy, or nuclear power, is the use of sustained nuclear fission to produce heat and electricity. Nuclear power plants provide for about 6% of the world's energy, and about 13-14% of the world's electricity.
What are some good things we can get out of nuclear energy? Well, with nuclear fission being used in uranium, nuclear plants provide a million times more energy than a wind powered or hydro powered plant. Because of this, a large amount of electricity can be generated. Another big advantage is that it releases no greenhouse gases during the nuclear reaction. Because of the lack of greenhouse gases being emitted, there is very little negative effect on the environment. Nuclear reactors also make use of uranium as fuel. Fission reaction to a small amount of uranium generates a large amount of energy. Currently, the amount of uranium on Earth is expected to last for another 100 years.
These all sound very promising, right? However, there is a bad side to everything, even to nuclear energy. For one, nuclear power can be used for the production of nuclear weapons which can cause a great deal of devastation to people and the environment. Because the energy produced by nuclear power plants is large, it also requires a large capital cost. And the time required to build a plant would be 15-20 years! Waste from used uranium is also highly radioactive and harmful. The radioactivity does not go away for some time and there have been problems regarding the storage and disposal of nuclear wastes around the world.
![]() |
Chernobyl nuclear power plant |
![]() |
Fukushima Power Plant |
So, why are we talking about nuclear energy? Well, after our trip to the PCC, we headed over to the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant (or BNPP) to learn more about nuclear energy. We were still tired from the coastal clean-up, nevertheless we were excited to visit the plant. We expected to learn about the workings of a nuclear power plant and to learn more about the uses of nuclear energy.
Our expectations were high for this part of the field trip. The danger of radiation from a nuclear power plant usually makes it very undesirable as a tourist spot, but since this reactor was never used, it now makes for an excellent eco-tourism site.
The tour felt quite short, actually, but it was very interesting. We went gaga over the control room. There were so many buttons around us, it took all of our willpower not to press all of them and see what would happen! But don't worry, they didn't teach us how to make some sort of nuclear weapon or anything... or did they? <Insert sinister laugh here.> Nah.
When we regrouped, it came as no surprise that we had mixed answers when it came to this one crucial question - "Should we harness nuclear energy from power plants?" Dante, Nero and The Dragon Writer vote in favor of this. "The risks are easily outweighed by the advantages we would gain from this," Dante said. The Dragon Writer added, "It's like buying a car and not using it." Mikayla and Kelly, however, don't want to harness this energy, stating that "though it is more cost-efficient, the risks are far too dangerous, so why should we willingly put ourselves in danger?" How about you? Where do you stand?
Well, that's all we have for now, BUT stay tuned for more updates about nuclear energy!
Until the next post!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey Guys! Nice job on broadening the topic about nuclear energy and on whether or not you are in favor of harnessing that type of energy! And now, here are your corresponding scores for each category:
ReplyDeleteContent: 9
Coherence: 5
Creativity: 4
Voice: 4
Mechanics: 5
Text Layout: 5
Graphics and Multimedia: 4
Intellectual Honesty: 5
Total Score: 41/45
Your post was really focused in the topic (nuclear energy) and there were also sufficient information about it. There were also graphics that helped readers picture what you are talking about, but having more graphics would be better. And it’s nice to see that you also gave lots of examples when you gave the pros and cons of nuclear energy. KEEP up the GOOD work, GUYS!
-Members of “A Trip To Nature”
Interesting insights you have here.
ReplyDeleteHere are your scores:
Content - 10/10
Coherence - 5/5
Creativity - 5/5
Voice - 5/5
Mechanics - 5/5
Text Layout - 5/5
Graphics & Multimedia - 5/5
Intellectual Honesty - 3/5
Comments - 9/10
Peer - 41/45
Deductions - 1 point (for posting late)
TOTAL: 92/100
My only problem is that you did not give credit to the sources of your voluminous data. Nevertheless, it was ALMOST a perfect post. Job well done!